Our Commitment to Accuracy
At Paulinna, we believe everyone deserves access to reliable, evidence-based health information. Our editorial policy outlines how we create, review, and maintain our content to ensure it meets the highest standards of accuracy and trustworthiness.
How We Create Content
Research-First Approach
Every article begins with comprehensive research. Our writers consult:
- Peer-reviewed scientific journals (PubMed, Cochrane Library)
- Government health organisations (NHS, NIH, WHO)
- Reputable medical institutions (Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Harvard Health)
- Professional health organisations and their clinical guidelines
Our Writers
Our content is created by experienced health writers who specialise in translating complex scientific information into accessible, practical guidance. All writers have backgrounds in health, nutrition, or life sciences.
Medical Review Process
Health-related content undergoes review by qualified healthcare professionals before publication. Our medical reviewers verify:
- Scientific accuracy of health claims
- Appropriate use of medical terminology
- Inclusion of necessary safety warnings
- Alignment with current clinical guidelines
Our Editorial Standards
Evidence-Based Information
We distinguish between:
- Strong evidence: Supported by multiple randomised controlled trials or meta-analyses
- Moderate evidence: Supported by some clinical studies
- Emerging evidence: Based on preliminary or preclinical research
We clearly communicate the strength of evidence for any health claims and avoid overstating benefits or understating risks.
YMYL Compliance
As a health and wellness website, our content falls under Google’s “Your Money or Your Life” (YMYL) category. We take this responsibility seriously by:
- Never claiming supplements cure, treat, or prevent diseases
- Always recommending readers consult healthcare professionals
- Including comprehensive safety and interaction information
- Using hedged language (“may help”, “research suggests”) for unproven claims
Transparency
We believe in full transparency:
- Affiliate Disclosure: We clearly disclose when articles contain affiliate links
- Author Attribution: Every article identifies its author and their credentials
- Medical Review: Medically reviewed content identifies the reviewer
- Dates: We display publication and update dates on all content
Content Updates
Health science evolves constantly. We regularly review and update our content to reflect:
- New research findings
- Updated clinical guidelines
- Changes in product availability or formulations
- Reader feedback and questions
When significant updates are made, we note the revision date at the top of the article.
What We Don’t Do
- We don’t accept payment for positive reviews or editorial coverage
- We don’t publish content that contradicts established medical consensus without clear explanation
- We don’t make guarantees about health outcomes
- We don’t provide personalised medical advice
Product Recommendations
When we recommend products:
- Recommendations are based on quality, value, and evidence — not commission rates
- We prioritise products with third-party testing and quality certifications
- We disclose any affiliate relationships
- We include alternatives at different price points when possible
Corrections Policy
If we make an error, we correct it promptly and transparently:
- Minor corrections (typos, formatting) are made without notation
- Significant factual corrections are noted at the top of the article
- If an article requires substantial revision, we note this with the update date
Contact Us
We welcome feedback on our content. If you notice an error, have a question about our sources, or want to suggest an improvement, please contact us at:
Email: [email protected]
We review all feedback and respond to legitimate concerns within 5 business days.
Last updated: January 2026